One conversation we are now hearing regularly across the UK, Europe, and New Zealand is no longer theoretical. It is happening inside engineering teams today.

A developer we spoke with recently generated roughly three months of work for four people, produced around 15,000 lines of production-ready code using a single interactive prompt and a small group of coordinated AI agents, and believes the output was stronger than anything the team could have written collectively across decades of experience. His reaction was not excitement. It was concern about what this means for his job.

This is not a one-off story. It is becoming a pattern. And it has major implications for application security, secure software development, and the future of AI in cyber security.

The Rapid Growth Of AI In Software Development

AI-assisted coding has moved far beyond autocomplete. It is now acting as:

• A coding assistant
• A secure coding advisor
• A vulnerability scanner
• A governance and policy layer

The pace of change is accelerating quickly. Across multiple industries, we are seeing:

• Entire features generated in minutes
• Multiple AI agents collaborating on development tasks
• Security feedback happening during development rather than after release

This fundamentally changes how software is built and how risk must be managed.

Why Traditional Code Review Is Being Challenged

For decades, manual code review has been a cornerstone of the secure SDLC. Senior developers and AppSec teams inspected code, flagged risky patterns, and enforced standards before release.

AI is now embedding those capabilities directly into the development workflow.

Platforms such as Claude Code Security introduce:

• Secure code generation by default
• Real-time vulnerability detection
• Plain-language explanations of security risks
• Secure alternatives suggested instantly

This effectively embeds a lightweight AI SAST capability into the coding process.  In practical terms:

• Security feedback becomes immediate
• Developers learn secure patterns as they code
• Manual review bottlenecks begin to shrink

This does not eliminate security teams, but it reshapes their role significantly.

What Claude Code Security Actually Does

Claude Code Security, currently in preview, is designed to help organisations use AI coding safely within enterprise environments.

It combines:

• AI coding assistance
• Secure coding guidance
• Vulnerability scanning
• Governance and policy controls

The goal is simple. Allow organisations to adopt AI development without introducing supply-chain or data leakage risks.

Secure Code Generation By Default

Claude has been trained heavily on secure coding practices and is tuned to:

• Avoid insecure patterns
• Flag risky approaches
• Suggest safer alternatives
• Explain the security implications of design choices

If asked to generate authentication code, it can warn about:

• Hard-coded secrets
• Weak hashing
• Missing validation
• Insecure randomness

This “security-first bias” is becoming a major differentiator in AI development tooling.

AI Driven Vulnerability Detection In Practice

The built-in vulnerability scanner acts as an AI-driven secure code review that runs while developers write or submit code.

It analyses:

• Code pasted into the model
• Repository files connected to the tool
• Generated code before it is used
• Pull requests as integrations evolve

It focuses heavily on the OWASP Top 10 and real-world vulnerabilities.  Examples include:

• Injection vulnerabilities such as SQL or command injection
• Authentication and session weaknesses
• Hard-coded secrets and exposed credentials
• Cryptography misuse and weak encryption practices
• Input validation failures and unsafe file handling
• Dependency and supply-chain risks

Unlike traditional tools, the findings are explained in plain language and include secure examples to fix the issue. This turns vulnerability scanning into a teaching tool rather than just a reporting tool.

Governance And Enterprise Controls

One of the biggest blockers to AI adoption has been data security and governance.

Claude Code Security introduces controls that allow organisations to:

• Control what code the AI can access
• Prevent customer code being used for model training
• Monitor usage across teams
• Define guardrails and block risky prompts
• Maintain audit logging for compliance

This is designed to make AI coding tools acceptable within regulated environments and DevSecOps programmes.

Why This Is Both Positive And Disruptive

The benefits are clear:

• Faster development cycles
• Earlier detection of common vulnerabilities
• Improved consistency in secure coding
• Reduced pressure on scarce AppSec resources

However, the challenges are just as real.

AI dramatically increases the volume of code being produced. That means:

• Larger attack surfaces
• More APIs and integrations
• Greater reliance on automated controls

Security teams must now evaluate and trust AI reviewing AI-generated code.

What This Means For Developers And Security Teams

This is a sensitive topic. AI will not eliminate developers, but it will reshape the role.

Routine coding tasks are becoming automated. Skills increasing in importance include:

• Architecture and system design
• Threat modelling and security engineering
• Governance of AI development tooling
• Translating technical risk into business impact

The relationship between development and security is being compressed and accelerated.

The Strategic Question For Leaders

Security and technology leaders should now be asking:

• How do we govern AI-assisted development safely?
• How do we maintain assurance at increased development speed?
• How does DevSecOps evolve in an AI-driven world?

These questions are already appearing in boardrooms.

AI is not just accelerating development. It is redefining how software is secured.

👉If you’re keen to learn more about how AI development fits into your security and governance, we would love to help…

🇬🇧 📞 +44 (0) 113 341 0123

🇳🇿 📞 +64 (0)9 802 2444

📧 hello@itogether.com